BCG Blog

2024 was full of dramatic moments. Given that, it might be easy to have missed some of the key details and trends in the less dramatic world of employee benefit plans. We thought a review of trends and regulations could be helpful for those whose attention may have been drawn to elsewhere.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. It’s tempting to say that the key themes of 2024 for the investment profession were the same as for years past. You might even ask yourself, is it worth it to do a year in review? We think so.

Trendspotting in alternative investing include generational preferences as well as a close look at the traditional alternative asset classes. And oh, don’t overlook bonds.

Some analysts are making predictions for how the Trump Administration may impact retirement planning based on changes in personnel, others are focused on the changed regulatory structure. But one thing is for certain: the market may be volatile once again.

Employees’ interest in savings accounts may be as high as the rates offered on those accounts. But regulations are still slightly less than salient when it comes to how sponsors enroll and incentivize employees to enroll in savings accounts.

The SEC may be making news lately for its crackdown on cryptocurrency, but the real story may be how its agenda has been changing concerning enforcement actions. Here are a few things financial advisors should consider.

Market costs have been putting many small financial firm owners in a bind. They may find themselves between the rock of needing to increase warm leads and the hard place of reducing costs. There is an answer, and it may be to borrow a popular trick from household management: meal prepping.

This summer FINRA released its industry snapshot for 2024. This report provides a solid overview of changes in the industry over the last year. Financial advisors may want to keep an eye on any trends such as an industry consolidation towards firms with more experience and growth of registered agents in the South and Southeast.

The Supreme Court’s summer term in 2024 may be one of the most memorable in decades. But that doesn’t mean it’s time to look away. Three cases set for argument in October of 2024 could have impacts for financial advisors and investment professionals. Here’s what you need to know.

Given the potential changes in regulatory power that could flow from the Supreme Court’s decisions in the summer of 2024, plan sponsors may be wondering if there might be changes in how the DOL enforces its regulations. But that might not be the right tree to go barking up. Instead, a key to understanding changes in enforcement actions could lay with its leadership and its budget.

Plan Sponsors may want to consider addressing common misconceptions plan participants have when looking to planning educational resources. Three of the most common misconceptions in retirement planning are 1) budgeting only to prepare; 2) longevity missteps; and 3) amounts over accounts.

Many Americans have access to retirement benefits through their workplace but may not know how to optimize these benefits. Sometimes, it’s helpful for plan sponsors to review the basics of just how those benefits work and what they mean. Here is a review of the news: both what gets media attention as well as new offerings by plan sponsors.

Given the dynamic pace of change in the financial industry and to financial advisors finding new marketing products, advisors may want to stop and listen before firing up a new marketing plan involving cross-selling and collaboration. Here is a background on the topic so that advisors can spot issues to discuss with their compliance and legal counsel.

Many employers have begun offering employee wellness benefits to their student and intern workers. Yet, some elements of those wellness programs, such as financial wellness components around retirement planning, may not be available to interns. Employers that are plan sponsors may want to help their participants with retirement readiness and may encourage early active participation in a retirement plan.

New recommendations from the federal government call for wider use of dashboards for retirement plan participants. But plan sponsors know that not all dashboards are created equal. Following tips on user experience from other industries can help sponsors craft dashboards that help participants be better prepared for their investment planning.

The merits of alternative investments for many investors as appropriate vehicles for diversification can be reduced when decisions are motivated by emotional investing. While advisors are familiar with this dangerous dynamic duo, new approaches suggest that the risky mix of emotional investing and alternative investments may be harmonized by something as simple as education.

Recent Supreme Court cases restricting the powers of regulatory agencies like the DOL and SEC cases may have injected an enormous punch of uncertainty into most financial advisor’s plans. It could be the ultimate unknown unknown. But fear not, advisors may have a friend in flexibility.

A handful of federal cases ruling in favor of plan sponsors on recordkeeping fees may provide important details on effective benchmarking. Sponsors may note that merely comparing fees between plans was not deemed a sufficient basis of comparison. Instead, comparator plans (for benchmarking) should include all services requested.

REAL ID is making it really hard to open new accounts. The change in identity verification requirements may only impact not yet enrolled plan participants. Yet, for participants who may be opening multiple accounts (such as those who’ve moved or younger participants) the increase in requirements could deter their interest in enrolling in benefits.

In the race to keep up with AI advancements, it seems like financial advisors just got a power boost. In early June of 2024, the FINRA Investor Education Foundation reported new research suggesting consumer trust favored financial professionals more than AI in terms of financial information.

Recent research released in June of 2024 by MFS Investment Management may reflect that the scope of risk is shifting. These concerns include administrative and regulatory changes as well as continuing concerns about retirement readiness of plan participants. These concerns about managing volatility and adjusting for potential litigation risks may have financial advisors considering their current offerings of investment monitoring.

Recent enforcement actions by the Department of Labor indicate an uptick in cases against profit sharing plans. Class action settlements show that plaintiffs continue to keep a watchful eye on retirement plan fee choices. A new report indicates that activist shareholder whistleblowers may be using more than 10% of the SEC’s enforcement budget.

A new report by the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) highlights that rise in interest in private pensions. Their report makes recommendations for private, non-union based, pension plans. Given an interest by public pensions such as CalPERS in how they manage assets to hedge risks, the NIRS recommendations indicate a change towards positively viewing pensions.

A new report shows that a large percentage of employees are using AI at work, without their employer’s knowledge or approval. Unauthorized AI can create serious cybersecurity risks for those handling private financial information. Such use may also run afoul of the EBSA’s recommendations for retirement plan service providers.

A recent opinion from the Supreme Court on a regulatory agency’s funding could resolve some questions over the future of regulation of the retirement planning industry. Yet, there may also be changes on the horizon through related legislation.

A new report from the Center for Retirement Research may be important for advisors who plan to pitch their fiduciary services to small firms. Released in March of 2024, the 2023 Small Business Retirement Survey assesses the beliefs of small business owners regarding retirement benefits and how those beliefs move their decisions to offer, or not, such benefits.

The average professional worker is swamped by more than 120 emails per day. In this deluge of emails, a problem bobs along like a tiny rowboat: your marketing leads. If you feel like you need to level up your follow ups, here are a few new strategies we’ve seen from a variety of industries.

When it comes to hardship withdrawals, participants may focus more on what they hear and not what is in your plan. Plan Sponsors may want to pause and consider what participants hear versus what the new laws now permit.

Over the last few years, employers took note of the role benefits played in recruiting employees. Some employers considered matching payments to student loans. But nearly half of employers have chosen not to adopt matching programs. And now several trends may show that hesitancy is warranted.

Recently, the IRS issued guidance on implementing section 348 (cash balance accounts). This guidance may hint at potential regulatory flexibility towards plan testing. Similarly, section 304 (automatic cash out of small accounts) could lead to flexibility in plan audits for small plans.

As corporate governance business processes become part of plan litigation, and because benefits may be an area ripe for budget trimming, management of employee benefits policies is attracting more attention. Caution is due in this area as AI systems create their own risks.

Has the agency tasked with enforcing ERISA performed on the prediction of increased enforcement action under in the Biden Administration or did it focus on new regulations instead? We compared the first year of the new administration to last year to find out.

2023 ranks among the highest for number of lawsuits against plan administrators in the last decade or so, and 2022 had nearly 100 such suits. One reason for the spike is the 2021 Supreme Court ruling in Hughes v. Northwestern. This summer, the lower court ruled on the Hughes case, and its findings further muddied the waters on recordkeeping fees.

Last Fall, we noted several cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that could impact the power federal agencies have to regulate and prosecute plan sponsors. Many of those cases are now working their way through the Court and may have profound impact on agencies such as FINRA, the SEC and the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. They may also impact the Department of Labor and its investigative wing, the EBSA.

Two recent studies released in January of 2024 point in opposite directions: one indicates that inflation may be slowing down quieting consumer concerns, others say inflation is still top of mind for most workers. What gives? It may be where investors live. For advisors struggling with determining how to manage inflation’s impact on their clients, digging into these studies may help.

Three major supreme court opinions may be coming soon that could have significant implications for financial advisors and they may not be the ones you’ve heard about. These cases may be more significant: they may reduce the ability of agency regulators to oversee, investigate, and fine financial advisors and institutions by changing a long-held rule deferring to federal agencies in their decisions.